Cromer v. Nicholson

19 Vet. App. 215 (2005)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Cromer v. Nicholson

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
19 Vet. App. 215 (2005)

Facts

William Cromer (plaintiff) served in the United States Army from 1945 to 1947. In 1993, Cromer filed a claim with the Department of Veterans Affairs (the VA) (defendant) for a service-connected disability for dementia. Comer claimed that his dementia initially originated from an in-service high fever and brain infection allegedly caused by contaminated milk he consumed. All of Cromer’s service medical records, however, were missing and likely had been lost during a fire in 1973 at a government records storage facility. The VA denied his claim for lack of evidence of a service connection, and Cromer appealed to the Board of Veteran’s Appeals (the board). The board upheld the denial, finding that Cromer’s dementia began decades after service and there was no evidence to support a service connection. Cromer appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, alleging that he was entitled to a presumption of a service connection due to the government’s loss of his service medical records, which should shift the burden of proof to the VA to disprove his claimed service connection.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership