Crooker v. California
United States Supreme Court
357 U.S. 433 (1958)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Crooker (defendant) was arrested for murder and told police that he was fully aware of his right to remain silent. He had been studying criminal law at law school. He asked permission to contact his lawyer during interrogation, but the police denied this request. Crooker eventually confessed to the murder. He was convicted. He appealed on the grounds that his due process rights were violated when the police refused him the opportunity to contact his lawyer. As a result, he contended, the trial court should not have admitted the confession into evidence. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Clark, J.)
Dissent (Douglas, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.