Cummings v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Washington
614 P.2d 1283 (1980)
In 1973, Mr. Cummings (defendant) and Ms. Anderson (plaintiff) purchased a residence as tenants in common. Both split the closing costs equally, and made their monthly payments out of a joint bank account the couple held. In 1975, Ms. Anderson left the residence, taking with her much of the property in the home. Mr. Cummings continued to make all payments on the house. Ms. Anderson then brought suit for the one-half interest she claimed in the property. The trial court determined that the parties’ contributions were equal, and that Ms. Anderson abandoned her interest by leaving the residence. Ms. Anderson then appealed, with the court of appeals determining that Ms. Anderson was entitled to one-half of the value of the property. Mr. Cummings petitioned for certiorari to the Supreme Court of Washington.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Rosellini, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.