Cunard Steamship Company v. Salen Reefer Services AB

773 F.2d 452 (1985)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Cunard Steamship Company v. Salen Reefer Services AB

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
773 F.2d 452 (1985)

AR

Facts

Salen Reefer Services AB (Salen) (defendant), a Swedish business, filed for bankruptcy in Sweden and obtained a stay on creditor actions. A month later, Cunard Steamship Company (Cunard) (plaintiff) obtained an order of attachment against Salen’s assets from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The underlying contract between Cunard and Salen provided for arbitration in England for any dispute. Salen moved to dissolve Cunard’s attachment, and the court ruled in Salen’s favor. The court held that the public policy of the United States would be furthered by granting comity to the Swedish court’s stay on creditor actions during the Swedish bankruptcy proceeding. Cunard appealed, arguing that the Swedish bankruptcy court lacked in personam jurisdiction over Cunard and in rem jurisdiction over the attached property. As a general creditor, Cunard believed it could attach funds to secure payment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Re, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 826,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 826,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 991 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 826,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 991 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership