From our private database of 22,600+ case briefs...
Curtice Brothers Co. v. Catts
Court of Chancery of New Jersey
66 A. 935 (1907)
Catts (defendant) is a tomato farmer. Curtice Brothers Co. (Curtice) (plaintiff) is a tomato packing plant. Curtice contracted to purchase all of the tomatoes grown on a certain piece of property owned by Catts. Six weeks before harvest time, Curtice began preparing for the tomatoes it expected to receive from Catts by purchasing the required packing materials and equipment and hiring additional labor. Catts refused to furnish the tomatoes to Curtice as agreed. Curtice brought suit in the Court of Chancery of New Jersey, a court of equity, seeking specific performance of the contract.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Leaming, V.C.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 519,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 519,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.