D.M. Levin v. Staatssecretaris Van Justitie

Case 53/81, 1982 E.C.R. 1035 (1982)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

D.M. Levin v. Staatssecretaris Van Justitie

European Union Court of Justice
Case 53/81, 1982 E.C.R. 1035 (1982)

Facts

D.M. Levin (plaintiff), a citizen of the United Kingdom, applied for a permit to reside in the Netherlands. The Netherlands denied the request on the grounds that Levin did not have gainful employment in the Netherlands. Levin brought a lawsuit arguing that she was wrongfully denied a residence permit under European Union (EU) law. The Netherlands maintained that the guarantee of freedom of movement for workers under community law did not apply to individuals who earned less than the minimum subsistence wage or worked less than the minimum number of hours to be considered full-time employment according to the minimum-wage and minimum-hours standards set by national laws in EU member states.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 824,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership