D'Onofrio v. SFX Sports Group, Inc.
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
247 F.R.D. 43 (2008)
- Written by DeAnna Swearingen, LLM
Facts
Audrey D’Onofrio (plaintiff) sued her employer, SFX Sports Group, Inc. (SFX) (defendant), alleging gender discrimination and wrongful termination in violation of the District of Columbia Human Rights Act, the Equal Pay Act, and the District of Columbia Family Medical Leave Act. During discovery, D’Onofrio asked SFX to produce its business plan. The discovery request instructed that documents “stored or maintained in the normal course of business” be produced so as to preserve and identify the files where the documents were stored. SFX provided the business plan, but not in its original format. D’Onofrio moved to compel SFX to produce the business plan in the original format with metadata, arguing that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 34 only permits a party to provide documents in a format other than the original “if necessary.” SFX responded that: (1) D’Onofrio did not request that documents be provided in a particular format, (2) the FRCP did not require the documents be produced in their original electric format with metadata, and (3) D’Onofrio made no showing that the metadata was relevant.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Facciola, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.