Data Sales Company v. Diamond Z Manufacturing
Arizona Court of Appeals
74 P.3d 268 (2003)
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
Zehr Wood & Tire Grinding, Inc. (Zehr Wood) (defendant) purchased a large recycling machine called a tub grinder from Diamond Z Manufacturing (Diamond) (defendant). Three years later, Zehr Wood still owed $375,000 for the grinder. Zehr Wood entered into a leaseback agreement with Equipment Leasing Corporation (ELC), selling the grinder to ELC for $375,000 and then leasing the grinder back. As part of the leaseback agreement, Diamond executed a guaranty assuming liability for the lease payments in the event of a default by Zehr Wood. The guaranty agreement expressly permitted an amendment of the lease, including a substitution of parties, without Diamond’s consent. Thereafter, ELC assigned its interest in the lease to Data Sales Company, Inc. (Data Sales) (plaintiff). Data Sales immediately made payment to Diamond. Zehr Wood later assigned the lease to Breaux Bridge Resources, Inc. (Breaux Bridge). After only three payments, Breaux Bridge defaulted on the lease and filed for bankruptcy. Data Sales brought suit against Diamond and Zehr Wood to recover the balance owed under the leaseback agreement. Diamond moved for summary judgment, arguing that § 48 of the Restatement (Third) of Suretyship and Guaranty (Restatement) barred a guarantor from waiving the suretyship defense under Restatement § 41(b)(i), which allowed a guarantor to defend against payment obligations if the guarantor’s underlying obligations were modified without notice or consent. The trial court denied the motion. Diamond appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Irvine, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.