Davidson Brothers, Inc. v. D. Katz & Sons, Inc.
New Jersey Supreme Court
579 A.2d 288 (1990)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Davidson Brothers, Inc. (Davidson) (plaintiff) operated a supermarket on a tract of land in downtown New Brunswick (George Street property) and later acquired a second supermarket about two miles away. The following year, Davidson closed the store on the George Street property because of lost sales to Davidson’s new grocery store. Davidson sold the George Street property to D. Katz & Sons, Inc. (Katz) (defendant), subject to a covenant that prohibited anyone from using the property for a grocery store. The New Brunswick Housing Authority (NBHA) subsequently acquired the George Street property and leased it to C-Town, provided that C-Town used it for a grocery store. Davidson sued Katz, NBHA, and C-Town (defendants) to specifically enforce the covenant in the deed to Katz. The trial court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, holding that the covenant was unenforceable because the burden on the landowner did not run with the land. The New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, affirmed on the alternative ground that the benefit to Davidson did not run with the land, because the prohibited use did not touch and concern the land. Davidson petitioned the New Jersey Supreme Court for certification.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Garibaldi, J.)
Concurrence (Pollock, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.