Davis Oil Company v. Steamboat Petroleum Corporation
Supreme Court of Louisiana
583 So. 2d 1139 (1991)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Davis Oil Company (Davis) (plaintiff) and Steamboat Petroleum Corporation (Steamboat) (defendant) were lessees in oil and gas leases on adjacent tracts of land. Davis petitioned the commissioner of conservation (Commissioner) with a proposed unitization plan that did not include portions of Steamboat’s leasehold. Steamboat opposed Davis’s petition and filed a counterproposal with the Commissioner. The Commissioner issued an order establishing a forced unitization that included a portion of Steamboat’s leasehold. The order appointed Davis as operator of the unit. Davis drilled two dry holes on the unit. Davis had offered Steamboat the chance to participate in the drilling, but Steamboat declined. Davis billed Steamboat for a portion of the drilling costs, but Steamboat refused to pay. Davis brought suit against Steamboat, seeking payment. The trial court found that Steamboat was not liable for the costs. The court of appeal reversed. Steamboat appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Dennis, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.