Davis v. Strazza

380 N.J. Super. 476, 882 A.2d 980 (2005)

From our private database of 47,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Davis v. Strazza

New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
380 N.J. Super. 476, 882 A.2d 980 (2005)

Facts

On May 31, 2001, Charles and Barbara Davis (plaintiffs) contracted to sell real property to Eileen Strazza, Nora Bernesby, and Christopher Bernesby (the purchasers) (defendants). The purchasers paid a $25,000 deposit that was refundable if the contract was lawfully canceled. The contract contained a mortgage-contingency clause stating that the contract was contingent on the purchasers obtaining a conventional 30-year mortgage. The purchasers were required to promptly apply for a mortgage. If a written mortgage agreement from a lender was not obtained within 30 days, then the contract could be canceled by either party. The purchasers promptly applied for a mortgage. On June 18, New Century Mortgage Company (New Century) issued a written mortgage commitment that contained certain prerequisites for funding, one of which was the Bernesbys’ sale of a property and Strazza’s sale of a property. They struggled to sell those properties despite price reductions because the properties needed significant repairs. On August 7, New Century canceled its mortgage commitment for failure to meet the funding conditions. The purchasers notified the Davises that the mortgage application had been denied and they were canceling the sale contract. The Davises sued the purchasers for breach of contract. The purchasers argued that the contract entitled them to cancel and have their deposit refunded. The trial court agreed, granting summary judgment in the purchasers’ favor. The Davises appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Yannotti, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 914,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 914,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,300 briefs, keyed to 999 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 914,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,300 briefs - keyed to 999 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership