De Souza Silva v. Pioneer Janitorial Services

777 F. Supp. 2d 198 (2011)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

De Souza Silva v. Pioneer Janitorial Services

United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
777 F. Supp. 2d 198 (2011)

  • Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD

Facts

Pricilla de Souza Silva (plaintiff) was employed by Pioneer Janitorial Services, Inc. (Pioneer) (defendant) and a member of the Service Employees International Union (union) (plaintiff). Silva’s supervisor allegedly sexually harassed Silva on a regular basis for multiple years. Silva filed a grievance report with the union, alleging the harassment under the collective-bargaining agreement (CBA) between the union and Pioneer. The CBA prohibited discrimination based on sex and allowed employees to pursue claims through the CBA’s grievance and arbitration procedure or any other legal forum. However, once an employee submitted a claim through a forum, that forum would be the sole and exclusive forum for the claim. The grievance procedure required three steps involving a series of written notifications and answers, as well as requested hearings. If the issue was not resolved by the third step, the union had exclusive power to refer the matter to arbitration. Neither Pioneer nor the union responded to Silva’s grievance in accordance with the grievance procedure. No hearing occurred on the sexual-harassment claims, and the union did not pursue the matter into arbitration. Silva filed suit in Massachusetts state court, and Pioneer removed the case to federal court. The union intervened as a plaintiff. Pioneer moved to dismiss the case, arguing that Silva waived her right to sue by filing a grievance and electing to proceed under the CBA’s grievance procedure instead of litigation.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Dein, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership