Deere Credit, Inc. v. Pickle Logging, Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Georgia
286 B.R. 181 (2002)
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
Tree-logging company Pickle Logging, Inc. (Pickle) (plaintiff) owned various types of logging equipment, including a 548G model skidder. Attempting to satisfy its debt to Deere Credit, Inc. (Deere) (defendant), Pickle refinanced eight pieces of its equipment with Deere. In both the financing statement and security agreement, one of the machines was improperly misidentified as a “648G skidder, serial number DW648GX568154” instead of a 548G skidder with a slightly different serial number, DW548GX568154. Pickle later filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. At the bankruptcy hearing, Pickle contended that Deere did not have a perfected security interest in the 548G skidder, because the agreement incorrectly referenced a 648G skidder. Expert testimony further established that 548G skidders and 648G skidders were very different machines in terms of cost, appearance, and performance. The bankruptcy court concluded that, because of the mislabeling in the relevant documents, Deere did not hold a perfected security interest in the 548G skidder. Deere filed a motion for reconsideration.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Laney, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.