Dehahn v. Innes
Maine Supreme Judicial Court
356 A.2d 711 (1976)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Everett Dehahn (plaintiff) and Richard Innes (defendant) contracted for Dehahn’s sale of heavy equipment to Innes. Upon delivery, and in response to Innes’s complaint that the equipment’s condition fell short of his expectations, Dehahn sent his employee to work on the equipment. Innes assisted the employee but ultimately rescinded the contract for trivial remaining defects that he could have set right at minimal cost. Dehahn later repossessed and resold the equipment and sued Innes. The trial court ruled that Innes had breached his contract and awarded Dehahn damages based on the difference between the equipment’s contract price and the price for which Dehahn resold it. Innes appealed to the Maine Supreme Judicial Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Dufresne, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.