Delaney v. Environmental Protection Agency

898 F.2d 687 (1990)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Delaney v. Environmental Protection Agency

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
898 F.2d 687 (1990)

Facts

In 1978, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (defendant) designated areas of Maricopa and Pima counties in Arizona as nonattainment areas for carbon monoxide under the Clean Air Act (CAA) for failing to achieve national ambient air quality standards. Arizona submitted revised state implementation plans for the counties in 1979, which were approved by the EPA in 1983. However, neither county attained the national standards for carbon monoxide by a 1982 deadline established by the 1977 amendments to the CAA. Arizona sought unsuccessfully to extend the deadline to 1987 and submitted revised plans to achieve national air quality standards by 1987. The EPA rejected the revised plans, a decision that was upheld by the court of appeals. Then, a group of residents from Maricopa and Pima counties (county residents) (plaintiffs) successfully sued the EPA, compelling the EPA to promulgate its own implementation plans for both counties by August 10, 1988, unless Arizona submitted an adequate plan before that date. Before the August deadline, Arizona submitted revised plans that the EPA approved. The EPA evaluated the plans on the basis of whether they provided for attainment of national standards by August 10, 1991, three years from the date of approval. The county residents again sued the EPA, arguing that the EPA’s approval of the revised plans was arbitrary and capricious.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wiggins, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership