DeLeo v. Swirsky

2002 WL 989526 (2002)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

DeLeo v. Swirsky

United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
2002 WL 989526 (2002)

Facts

Neal DeLeo (plaintiff) and his attorney, Bruce Golden, represented the interests of the shareholders of Easy Access International, Inc. (EAI) in an Illinois shareholder derivative lawsuit against Swirsky (defendant), a director of EAI, and others for fraud involving Zconnexx Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of EAI. DeLeo and Internet Yellow Pages Network, Inc., (Internet Yellow), a corporation half-owned by DeLeo, filed a second lawsuit against Swirsky and others in New York to hold them personally liable for Zconnexx’s fraud and theft of Internet Yellow’s property. The New York action was stayed, pending the bankruptcy of Zconnexx and another defendant. In the Illinois shareholder derivative suit, Swirsky filed a motion to have DeLeo and Swirsky disqualified as the plaintiffs’ class representative and counsel. DeLeo and Golden opposed the motion and argued that Swirsky lacked standing to seek their disqualification.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ashman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 824,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership