Demaco Corp. v. F. Von Langsdorff Licensing Ltd.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
851 F.2d 1387, 7 U.S.P.Q.2d 1222 (1988)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
Demaco Corporation (plaintiff) held a patent on a particular type of paving stone. Demaco brought an infringement action against F. Von Langsdorff Bauverfahren GmbH (defendant) and F. Von Langsdorff Licensing Limited (defendant) in federal district court. The court ruled that Demaco’s patent was invalid on the ground of obviousness because the invention was simple in design and provided no clear structural advantage over other types of paving stones. Demaco appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Newman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.