Dennis R. Beller v. J. William Middendorf

632 F.2d 788 (1980)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Dennis R. Beller v. J. William Middendorf

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
632 F.2d 788 (1980)

  • Written by Mike Begovic, JD

Facts

Three members of the United States Navy, Mary Saal, James Miller, and Dennis Beller (collectively, the officers) (plaintiffs), were honorably discharged after admitting to engaging in homosexual acts, conduct which was prohibited by the Navy. Each case proceeded before a discharge board and was reviewed by the secretary of the Navy, J. William Middendorf (defendant). Under the Navy’s regulations, the secretary was to discharge a person found by a discharge board to have engaged in homosexual acts. The regulations awarded the secretary discretion to retain a person in rare instances. Each of the officers filed a suit, alleging constitutional violations. In Saal’s case, a district court granted preliminary injunctive relief staying the discharge, and then granted partial summary judgment for her, holding that her application for reenlistment in the Navy must be evaluated without consideration of the Navy’s regulations for homosexual conduct. In each of the cases of Miller and Beller, a district court entered judgment in favor of the Navy. The cases were consolidated for review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kennedy, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership