Derry Senior Development, LLC v. Town of Derry
New Hampshire Supreme Court
157 N.H. 441, 951 A.2d 170 (2008)
- Written by Salina Kennedy, JD
Facts
Derry Senior Development, LLC (the developer) (plaintiff) applied for final site-plan approval to construct a residential development in the Town of Derry (the town) (defendant). The site plan included six community septic systems, each with four-inch sewage collection pipes. The plan had been approved by the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (DES) based on its finding that the sewage plan complied with state regulations. The Town of Derry Department of Public Works (DPW) opposed the development and requested that the site plan be changed to include a sewage-collection system built to the standards of the town’s sewer-division regulations, which were higher than the standards required by DES but were not applicable to site plans. The town had not enacted site-plan regulations governing septic-system requirements. The town planning board acknowledged that the site plan met DES requirements but denied approval of the plan because the proposed sewage system did not have large enough pipes. The board based its decision on testimony that community septic systems had failed in the past, coupled with the fact that four adjoining landowners had wells located downhill of the proposed system. The superior court affirmed the board’s decision, and the developer appealed to the New Hampshire Supreme Court. The developer argued that, because the town had not enacted site-plan regulations that specifically addressed septic-system requirements, DES approval should be prima facie proof that an applicant’s septic-system design was adequate.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Duggan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.