Detroit Base-Ball Club v. Deppert

27 N.W. 856 (1886)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Detroit Base-Ball Club v. Deppert

Michigan Supreme Court
27 N.W. 856 (1886)

Facts

The Detroit Base-Ball Club (club) (plaintiff) was a professional baseball team. The club played its home games at Recreation Park, which it enclosed with a high fence. The club generally charged fans a 50-cent admission fee to attend games. The club used the revenue from ticket sales to pay the majority of its approximately $3,000 in monthly expenses. Deppert (defendant) lived on a lot near Recreation Park, and he built a stand overlooking the field on his property. The club sued Deppert in equity, seeking an injunction requiring him to cease making his property available for fans to watch the club’s games. The club claimed that Deppert was diverting revenue from the club by charging a much lower admission fee to watch games from his stand. Deppert responded that Recreation Park’s high fence had damaged his property by blocking his unobstructed view and that he built the stand only to rectify this damage. Deppert further argued that (1) he did not charge an admission fee, but only sold refreshments; (2) he was frequently disturbed by players coming onto his land to pursue balls and by unruly attendees at Recreation Park, which regularly required him to call the police; (3) the stand passed all safety inspections; and (4) he was solvent and could pay any money judgment the club might win in an action at law. The trial court denied the requested injunction. The club appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sherwood, J.)

Dissent (Campbell, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership