Detwiler v. Zoning Hearing Board

596 A.2d 1156 (1991)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Detwiler v. Zoning Hearing Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
596 A.2d 1156 (1991)

RW
Play video

Facts

Donald and Mary Miller had long owned an odd-shaped lot, in an area zoned for residential use, on which they grew hay and kept some animals. The lot was across the street from a historic house owned by Philip and Babette Detwiler (plaintiffs). The Millers wanted to build a house on their own lot, but the township's rear setback line requirement uniquely reduced the odd-shaped lot's buildable footprint. The Millers applied to the Zoning Hearing Board of Lower Salford Township, Pennsylvania (defendant), for a variance reducing the rear setback line from 75 to 40 feet. The Detwilers opposed the application, in part on the grounds that a variance would reduce the value of their historic house as a community asset. The board found that (1) without a variance, it would be impossible for the Millers to build their house and (2) that the variance would have no discernible negative impact on neighboring properties. When the board granted the variance, the Detwilers sued. The Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County affirmed the board's decision, and the Detwilers appealed to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Barbieri, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 743,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 743,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 986 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 743,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 986 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership