DeVos v. Cunningham Group

297 So. 3d 1176 (2019)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
D
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

DeVos v. Cunningham Group

Alabama Supreme Court
297 So. 3d 1176 (2019)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

Doctors William DeVos and Donald Simmons (defendants) worked for Cunningham Group (plaintiff) providing pathology services for Brookwood Medical Center. The doctors’ employment agreements prohibited soliciting Cunningham clients for two years after termination, and said the doctors would forfeit a year’s salary if they gave less than 12 months’ notice of termination. After 11 years, both doctors terminated their employment without notice. Cunningham sued, alleging the doctors were soliciting Brookwood’s business. The court entered a preliminary injunction enforcing the noncompete and nonsolicitation clauses without addressing enforceability and required Cunningham to post a $25,000 bond. The doctors moved to increase the bond on the ground that together they were losing close to $300,000 a month based on what they previously earned providing pathology for Brookwood, and appealed. The trial court refused to increase the bond, reasoning it did not have jurisdiction once a notice of appeal was filed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Stewart, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 804,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Remedies

Key Terms