From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.
Diaz v. Eli Lilly & Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
302 N.E.2d 555 (1973)
- Written by Noah Lewis, JD
Facts
Milagros Diaz (plaintiff) and Jose Santos Diaz were married. Jose believed he was injured by the fungicide Parnon, which was manufactured by Eli Lilly (defendant). Jose suffered physical injuries that caused Milagros to be deprived of Jose’s affection, companionship, and assistance, so Milagros sued Eli Lilly for a loss of consortium. Milagros argued Eli Lilly was negligent in failing to warn users of the dangers of its product and therefore was responsible for her loss. Eli Lilly demurred, arguing Milagros had no cause of action. The Massachusetts Superior Court agreed, sustaining the demurrer. Milagros appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kaplan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
