Diaz v. United States
United States Supreme Court
144 S. Ct. 1727 (2024)
- Written by Nathan Benedict, JD
Facts
Delilah Diaz (defendant) was charged with importation of methamphetamine after a border search of her vehicle discovered 56 packages of methamphetamine hidden in the door panel, floorboards, and trunk. At trial, Diaz presented a “blind mule” defense, contending that she had no knowledge of the drugs in her vehicle. The government called Homeland Security Investigations Special Agent Andrew Flood as an expert witness. Flood testified that Mexican drug cartels rarely entrusted large quantities of drugs to unknowing couriers. Flood acknowledged that some organizations did use unknowing couriers. Diaz was convicted and appealed. She argued that Flood’s testimony was improper opinion testimony concerning her state of mind.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Thomas, J.)
Concurrence (Jackson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 926,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,400 briefs, keyed to 1,003 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

