Dickerson v. Union National Bank
Arkansas Supreme Court
595 S.W.2d 677 (1980)
Nina Dickerson was survived by two sons, Cecil and Martin Dickerson, both of whom had children. Martin was married, and Cecil was not. Nina’s will placed her assets in trust, with Union National Bank (the bank) as trustee. The trust was to continue until Cecil, Martin, and Martin’s widow, who was not identified in the will, had died, and the youngest of Cecil and Martin’s children had reached the age of 25. After Nina’s death, Cecil (plaintiff) filed a complaint against the bank (defendant), arguing that the trust was void under the rule against perpetuities. The lower court rejected Cecil’s arguments, and Cecil appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Smith, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 170,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.