Dieck v. Unified School District of Antigo
Wisconsin Supreme Court
477 N.W.2d 613 (1991)

- Written by Darius Dehghan, JD
Facts
Under Wis. Const. art. XI, § 3(3), a school district that incurred indebtedness was required to collect a tax. The Unified School District of Antigo (the district) (defendant) entered into a lease-purchase agreement (the lease) with the Antigo School Board Leasing Corporation (the leasing corporation). The leasing corporation would build a new high school and would hold title to the building. The district would make rental payments for the use of the building. If the district made rental payments for the entire 20-year lease term, the district would have the option to purchase the building from the leasing corporation. However, the lease contained a nonappropriation clause that granted the district the right to terminate the lease by electing not to appropriate funds for rental payments. Further, the district did not comply with the tax-levy provision of art. XI, § 3(3). William Dieck (plaintiff), a taxpayer, brought suit, contending that the lease was unconstitutional. The court of appeals found that the lease was constitutional. Dieck appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Abrahamson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.