Supreme Court of Michigan
141 N.W. 591 (1913)
Mr. Dienst (defendant) and Mrs. Dienst (plaintiff) developed a long-distance relationship through a brief correspondence. According to Mr. Dienst, he promised to marry Mrs. Dienst—which involved relocating to her state of residence and abandoning his employment—if Mrs. Dienst would support him financially during the marriage and will to him all of her property upon her death. Mrs. Dienst allegedly agreed and shortly after their marriage reached an oral agreement with Mr. Dienst about her will. Eventually, Mrs. Dienst filed for divorce. Mr. Dienst filed a cross-complaint in which he sought to enforce the oral antenuptial agreement regarding Mrs. Dienst’s will. The trial court sustained a demurrer filed by Mrs. Dienst. Mr. Dienst appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (McAlvay, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 240,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.