Diggs v. Shultz

470 F.2d 461 (1972)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Diggs v. Shultz

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
470 F.2d 461 (1972)

  • Written by Tanya Munson, JD

Facts

In 1966, the United Nations (UN) Security Council adopted a resolution that directed all UN member states to impose an embargo on trade with Southern Rhodesia. Southern Rhodesia was an exporter of metallurgic chromite. In 1971, Congress adopted the Byrd Amendment, which disallowed the president the ability to prohibit or regulate the importation of strategic materials so long as the region it was being imported from was not designated as Communist-dominated. The Office of Foreign Assets Control issued a General License to Union Carbide Corporation (defendant), authorizing Union Carbide Corporation to import various materials from Southern Rhodesia. Diggs (plaintiff) opposed the issuance of the license. Diggs claimed that the issuance of the license conflicted with the United States’ obligations under the UN Charter. The district court held that Congress may nullify a treaty commitment, and by passing the Byrd Amendment, Congress revoked an aspect of the United States’ treaty obligation under the UN Charter.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McGowan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership