From our private database of 13,300+ case briefs...
Dilly v. S.S. Kresge
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
606 F.2d 62 (1979)
Eleanor Dilly (plaintiff) injured her neck during the course of employment when an assistant manager of her employer, S.S. Kresge Co. (Kresge) (defendant), grabbed and shook her. Dilly brought this action against Kresge. The district court granted Dilly’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of Kresge’s liability, and set a hearing to determine the existence and amount of damages to award Dilly. Kresge filed a notice of appeal, which was taken prior to the ascertainment of damages. Kresge argues that the appeal from the grant of summary judgment for Dilly is an appeal from a final order.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Widener, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 140,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,300 briefs, keyed to 182 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.