Doe v. Chao
United States Supreme Court
540 U.S. 614 (2004)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
The United States Department of Labor (the department) (defendant) improperly disclosed Buck Doe’s Social Security number, in violation of the Privacy Act of 1974 (the act). Doe sued the department, seeking statutory damages for emotional distress that resulted from the disclosure. The district court granted Doe summary judgment and awarded him the minimum statutory award of $1,000. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed, finding that the statutory minimum was only available to compensate for actual damages, not emotional-distress damages. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Souter, J.)
Dissent (Ginsburg, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 990 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.