Doe v. Renfrow

475 F. Supp. 1012 (1979)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Doe v. Renfrow

United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
475 F. Supp. 1012 (1979)

Facts

Doe (plaintiff) was a student in an Indiana high school in 1978. School officials in the fall of 1978 recorded 21 instances of students on campus in possession of drugs or alcohol. School officials and local police officers in the canine units conducted searches as part of a policy to eliminate drugs on campus. Under the policy, a canine team visited each class during the first period of the school day. Teachers told students to sit and do their work while a dog handler led a police dog up and down the classroom aisles. When a police dog alerted to a student, the student was instructed to empty his or her pockets or purse. When the police dog continued to alert after 11 students emptied their pockets, then school officials conducted a body search of each student in the nurse’s station. Doe was one of the 11 students searched at the nurse’s station. Doe was questioned about her drug use and then asked to remove her clothing. After a female staffer examined Doe’s clothing and hair, Doe was allowed to dress after no drugs were found in her possession. Doe and a class of plaintiffs challenged the searches by suing school officials including Renfrow (defendant).

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sharp, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership