Donovan v. Bierwirth

754 F.2d 1049 (1985)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Donovan v. Bierwirth

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
754 F.2d 1049 (1985)

  • Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD

Facts

John Bierwirth, Robert Freese, and Carl Paladino (defendants) were trustees of the Grumman Corporation Pension Plan, an employee benefit plan governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). The trustees were also high-ranking officials in Grumman Corporation itself. In 1981, LTV Corporation, an outside business, made a tender offer for a controlling interest in Grumman at $45 per share. At the time, the pension plan held a significant number of Grumman’s shares of stock. The trustees chose not to tender any of the shares and instead directed the plan to purchase over one million additional shares of Grumman’s stock to defeat LTV’s tender offer. The day prior to LTV’s offer announcement, Grumman’s shares were priced at $26.75, but after the offer was announced, the price rose to $35.88. LTV’s offer distorted the market price of the shares, which normally had a lower value. When the trustees purchased their additional shares, the price was $36 to $39.34 per share. Several months later, the trustees sold their purchased stock, along with some previously held shares, for $47.55 each, earning a profit on their Grumman investment. Raymond Donovan (plaintiff), the secretary of the United States Department of Labor, filed suit in federal district court under ERISA, claiming that the trustees violated their fiduciary duties by imprudently buying Grumman stock through the pension plan at market prices distorted by LTV’s offer. The district court dismissed the complaint, finding that the plan did not suffer a loss within the meaning of ERISA § 409(a). Donovan appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Pierce, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership