Dowis v. Mud Slingers, Inc.

621 S.E.2d 413 (2005)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Dowis v. Mud Slingers, Inc.

Georgia Supreme Court
621 S.E.2d 413 (2005)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

Johnny Dowis (plaintiff) was hired by a Missouri corporation, Mud Slingers Inc. (defendant) to perform construction work. Dowis was injured at the work site in Georgia. Dowis filed for and received workers’-compensation benefits in Missouri. Later, Dowis filed a tort action in Georgia state court against Mud Slingers, seeking damages. If Missouri law applied, Dowis’s previous collection of workers’-compensation benefits would not preclude his tort action. However, if the court applied Georgia’s workers’-compensation law following the rule of lex loci delicti, Dowis could not both collect workers’-compensation benefits and bring a tort action for damages. Georgia law contained an exclusive-remedy provision. The trial court applied Georgia law and granted summary judgment for Mud Slingers. The court of appeal affirmed. The Georgia Supreme Court granted certiorari to consider whether to retain Georgia’s rule of lex loci delicti.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hines, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership