United States Supreme Court
372 U.S. 734 (1963)
Downum (defendant) was brought to trial on multiple counts. Both the defense and the prosecution said they were ready and a jury was impaneled. Later that same day, before any evidence had been presented, the prosecution asked that the jury be discharged because the prosecution was missing a key witness on two counts. Downum asked that these two counts be dismissed and that the case continue on the other counts. The court denied the motion and discharged the jury. A new jury was impaneled two days later. Downum pleaded former jeopardy but his plea was overruled. The jury found Downum guilty. At the time the first jury was impaneled, the prosecution knew that it was missing one of its key witnesses.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Douglas, J.)
Dissent (Clark, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 223,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.