From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.
Driscoll v. Corbett
Pennsylvania Supreme Court
69 A.3d 197 (2013)
- Written by Deanna Curl, JD
Facts
In 1968, Pennsylvania voters adopted changes to Article V of the Pennsylvania Constitution following a limited constitutional convention. Among the changes, Section 16(b) was adopted and provided that state justices, judges, and justices of the peace were subject to a mandatory retirement at age 70. In 1989, the mandatory-retirement provision in Section 16(b) was upheld after a challenge by several state judges to its constitutionality under the state and federal constitution. Driscoll and other state judges (the judges) (plaintiffs) subsequently initiated new legal action alleging Section 16(b) violated their rights to equal protection and due process under the Pennsylvania Constitution.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Saylor, J.)
Concurrence (Eakin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
