Drummond Coal Sales, Inc. v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company

3 F.4th 605 (2021)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Drummond Coal Sales, Inc. v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
3 F.4th 605 (2021)

KL
Play video

Facts

Drummond Coal Sales, Inc. (Drummond) (plaintiff), a coal supplier, entered into a contract with Norfolk Southern Railway Company (NSRC) (defendant) in which Drummond agreed to ship a certain amount of coal each year in exchange for fixed shipping rates. The contract provided that if Drummond failed to ship the required amount of coal, it would owe shortfall fees to NSRC. Additionally, the contract expressly allowed NSRC to enter into contracts with other utility companies. NSRC had confidential contracts with other utility companies that imposed liquidated damages on the utility companies for purchasing and shipping coal from Drummond. After Drummond and NSRC entered into their contract, United States regulations forced utilities to reduce their use of coal, making the United States coal market less attractive. From 2010 to 2016, Drummond did not ship any coal with NSRC under the contract. Drummond paid shortfall fees to NSRC for the years 2010 to 2014. Drummond preemptively filed suit against NSRC seeking declaratory relief excusing its obligation under the contract and rescission of the contract, alleging that NSRC breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing by depriving Drummond of the benefit of the contract, among other claims. The jury found in Drummond’s favor on three factual issues: (1) NSRC prevented Drummond from shipping coal under the contract; (2) NSRC’s conduct constituted a breach of contract, either expressly or under the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; and (3) the breach was material. Drummond moved for judgment excusing it from paying shortfall fees and seeking a return of the shortfall fees already paid. The district court excused Drummond from paying additional shortfall fees but declined to order NSRC to repay the shortfall fees it had already collected. NSRC argued on appeal that no reasonable jury could find that NSRC had breached its obligation under the contract.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Quattlebaum, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership