Dryden v. Tri-Valley Growers

65 Cal. App. 3d 990, 135 Cal. Rptr. 720 (1977)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Dryden v. Tri-Valley Growers

California Court of Appeal
65 Cal. App. 3d 990, 135 Cal. Rptr. 720 (1977)

Facts

James Dryden, individually, and Paul R. Minasian and Malcolm R. Minasian, a partnership, (Dryden) (plaintiffs) sued Tri-Valley Growers (Tri-Valley) and several unnamed persons (defendants) on tort theories of intentional interference with contractual and/or advantageous economic and business relationships regarding Dryden’s contractual relationship with Villa D’Oro. Dryden had contracts to purchase certain waste products from Villa D’Oro, an olive oil processing plant that was purchased by Tri-Valley. The gist of Dryden’s grievance was that Tri-Valley’s purchase of Villa D’Oro unjustifiably interfered with and induced the breach of its contracts with Villa D’Oro. Tri-Valley filed a general demurrer to the original complaint that was sustained with leave to amend. Tri-Valley also demurred to the third, fourth, fifth, and sixth causes of action in Dryden’s first amended complaint, alleging that they failed to allege sufficient facts. The trial court again sustained the demurrer but this time without leave to amend. Dryden appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kane, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership