Dupree v. Younger
United States Supreme Court
598 U.S. 729 (2023)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Kevin Younger (plaintiff) sued Neil Dupree (defendant) for violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Dupree filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that Younger had not exhausted his administrative remedies. The district court denied the motion. At trial, Dupree did not present his exhaustion defense. The jury found in Younger’s favor. Dupree did not file a posttrial motion. Dupree appealed solely on the exhaustion defense. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled that Dupree had been required to preserve the issue by filing a posttrial motion and failed to do so. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Barrett, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.