Durand v. IDC Bellingham, L.L.C.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
793 N.E.2d 359 (2003)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
IDC Bellingham, L.L.C. (IDC) (defendant) wanted to build a second power plant in Bellingham. In order to do so, it needed the town to rezone the parcel of land on which it intended to build. IDC agreed to make an $8 million gift to the town if it voted to rezone the land. Subsequently, the town voted in favor of rezoning. Eight residents who owned land near the rezoned parcel (landowners) (plaintiffs) then brought suit seeking a declaratory judgment that the rezoning was void because it constituted illegal contract zoning. The trial court found that contract zoning had not occurred, but that the offer of the $8 million gift nullified the rezoning vote. IDC appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cordy, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Spina, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.