E-Pass Technologies, Inc. v. Moses & Singer, LLP

2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96231 (2011)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

E-Pass Technologies, Inc. v. Moses & Singer, LLP

United States District Court for the Northern District of California
2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96231 (2011)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Moses & Singer, LLP (defendant) represented E-Pass Technologies, Inc. (E-Pass) (plaintiff) in multiple patent-infringement actions. The defendants in those actions moved for summary judgment against E-Pass and for attorneys’ fees and costs against E-Pass and Moses & Singer. Moses & Singer represented E-Pass until at least some time after the date the attorneys’-fees motion was decided. While Moses & Singer was representing E-Pass, Moses & Singer attorneys engaged in intra-firm communications about how to protect the firm from liability on the attorneys’-fees motion. After the defendants in the patent-infringement actions were granted summary judgment and attorneys’ fees and costs, E-Pass sued Moses & Singer for professional negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, and negligent misrepresentation. During discovery, E-Pass served Moses & Singer with requests for the production of documents. Moses & Singer objected and withheld as privileged certain documents described as “email communication with counsel.” E-Pass moved to compel Moses & Singer to produce the documents.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Corley, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership