E. Udolf, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company

573 A.2d 1211, 214 Conn. 741 (1990)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

E. Udolf, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company

Connecticut Supreme Court
573 A.2d 1211, 214 Conn. 741 (1990)

Facts

E. Udolf, Inc. (the store) (plaintiff) was a retail men’s-clothing store. The store’s only officer, director, and shareholder was Leonard Udolf, who was at the store 10 to 20 percent of the time. In Udolf’s absence, the store was run by Kenneth Auer, the store manager, who handled the store’s operations; Auer had the authority to hire and fire employees and was expected to report all activities to Udolf. An employee of the store, Lynn Bjork, misappropriated $6,000. In 1981 Anna Shukis, the store’s bookkeeper, discovered the misappropriations and informed Auer. Both Shukis and Auer were expected to report Bjork’s misappropriations to Udolf. Instead, Auer and Shukis allowed Bjork to make restitution for the $6,000 and remain employed. From 1981 through 1983, Bjork misappropriated an additional $48,715.08 from the store. Bjork was immediately fired by Auer under orders of Udolf. The store notified Aetna Casualty and Surety Company and Fire and Casualty Insurance Company of Connecticut (the insurers) (defendants) of the losses incurred from Bjork’s misappropriations. The insurers refused to indemnify the store because the store had imputed knowledge of Bjork’s previous misappropriation, which excluded coverage for Bjork’s misappropriation. The company sued the insurers. The trial court entered judgment for the insurers, reasoning that Auer and Shukis’s knowledge of Bjork’s 1981 misappropriation was imputed to the store, and any subsequent losses caused by Bjork’s dishonesty were excluded by coverage. The store appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hull, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership