Earle v. Fiske
Supreme Court of Massachusetts
103 Mass. 491 (1870)
Nancy Fiske executed and delivered a deed conveying a life estate in real property to her son and sole heir, Benjamin Fiske, and his wife, Elizabeth Fiske. The deed conveyed fee simple title to Mary Fiske upon the termination of the life estate. Nancy Fiske died in 1865. Benjamin Fiske executed a deed to Earle (plaintiff) in 1866. Nancy Fiske’s original deed was recorded in 1867. Earle filed a quiet title suit against Elizabeth and Mary Fiske (defendants). The trial court held that Nancy Fiske’s deed conveyed her full interest in the property at the time of execution and therefore Benjamin Fiske did not inherit fee simple title upon Nancy Fiske’s death. As such, the trial court ruled that Benjamin Fiske did not possess good title capable of being conveyed to Earle at the time that Fiske executed the deed to Earle. Earle appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Ames, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.