Ede v. Atrium South Ob-Gyn, Inc.

71 Ohio St. 3d 124, 642 N.E.2d 365 (1994)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Ede v. Atrium South Ob-Gyn, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court
71 Ohio St. 3d 124, 642 N.E.2d 365 (1994)

RW

Facts

Sheri Ede died following surgery conducted by Dr. George R. Dakoske (defendant), president of Atrium South OB-GYN, Inc. (Atrium) (defendant). Charles Ede (plaintiff), Mrs. Ede's widower, sued Dakoske and Atrium, alleging their negligence caused Mrs. Ede's death. At trial, Dr. Schneider gave expert testimony on Dakoske's behalf. The judge excluded Ede's evidence that the same company insured both Dakoske and Schneider on the grounds that the prejudicial nature of such evidence outweighed its value in proving the insurer coerced Schneider's testimony. The trial ended in judgment for Dakoske and Atrium. On appeal to the Supreme Court of Ohio, Ede argued Schneider's insurance premiums could increase if Dakoske lost his case, and this alone sufficed to make evidence of a common insurer relevant and admissible to show Schneider's bias.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Pfeifer, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 736,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 736,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 736,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership