Edwards v. Allouez Mining Co.
Supreme Court of Michigan
38 Mich. 46 (1878)
Allouez Mining Company (Allouez) (defendant) built a copper-mining mill on a creek. As part of the copper-mining process, large amounts of sand flowed into the creek and were deposited on nearby downstream tracts of land. Edwards (plaintiff) bought one of the downstream tracts of land approximately one year after Allouez built the mill. Edwards did not buy the land for his own use. Edwards’s intent was to force Allouez to buy the land at a large profit. Edwards offered to sell Allouez the land for approximately three to five times the amount that Edwards paid. Allouez declined the offer. Edwards brought suit, seeking an injunction preventing Allouez from depositing sand on his land. The trial court denied the injunction but sent the case to a jury trial for an assessment of damages. Edwards appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Cooley, J.)
Dissent (Campbell, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.