From our private database of 37,200+ case briefs...
El Al Israel Airlines, Ltd. v. Tseng
United States Supreme Court
525 U.S. 155 (1999)
Tsui Yuan Tseng (plaintiff) sued El Al Israel Airlines (defendant) under state law for emotional distress caused by an intrusive airport search. Tseng did not bring the claim under the Warsaw Convention, which regulates air-carrier liability, because the United States Supreme Court had previously held that emotional-distress damages were barred under the Warsaw Convention without physical injuries. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the claims were permissible because the Warsaw Convention did not preempt the state-law tort claims. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Ginsberg, J.)
Dissent (Stevens, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 631,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 631,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.