From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...
Elbeshbeshy v. Franklin Institute
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
618 F. Supp. 170 (1985)
Rashad Elbeshbeshy (plaintiff) was employed by the Franklin Institute (institute) (defendant) for approximately three months in the institute’s nuclear structural-mechanics unit. Elbeshbeshy was responsible for certain aspects of drafting and submitting proposals for nuclear-power plants to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (commission). Elbeshbeshy drafted two proposals that were reviewed by his supervisor, Vu Con, and by Con’s supervisor, Salvatore Carfagno. Con believed that the proposals were deficient. Carfagno did not express an opinion on the substance of Elbeshbeshy’s work but decided that the working relationship between Con and Elbeshbeshy was problematic. The institute terminated Elbeshbeshy’s employment and cited lack of cooperation as the reason for the discharge in Elbeshbeshy’s personnel record. Elbeshbeshy believed that he was terminated due to professional jealousy. Elbeshbeshy sued the institute for defamation, and the institute moved for summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Bechtle, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 546,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.