Electric Insurance Co. v. Freudenberg-NOK, General Partnership

487 F. Supp. 2d 894 (2007)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Electric Insurance Co. v. Freudenberg-NOK, General Partnership

United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
487 F. Supp. 2d 894 (2007)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

Freudenberg-NOK, General Partnership (FNOK) (defendant) supplied General Electric Company (GE) (plaintiff) with a pump-seal assembly part for GE’s dishwashers. The part was made with a carbon-steel insert. The carbon-steel inserts were prone to corrosion and caused the pump-seal assemblies to fail. FNOK switched to using stainless-steel inserts as a result. Numerous homeowners made claims to GE that leaking dishwashers had caused property damaged. Electric Insurance Company (EIC) (plaintiff), GE’s product-liability insurer, settled many property-damage claims on behalf of GE totaling $8 million. About one-fourth of the claims were paid before November 22, 2000 (479 out of 2,104 claims totaling about $1.6 million). EIC sued FNOK, seeking to enforce GE’s right to indemnity from FNOK. FNOK filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that EIC’s claims were time barred by the four-year statute of limitations for contract actions and, alternatively, claims arising before November 22, 2000, were barred by the state’s residual five-year statute of limitations.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Coffman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership