Elgin v. Marshall
United States Supreme Court
106 U.S. 578, 1 S. Ct. 484, 27 L. Ed. 249 (1883)
- Written by Heather Whittemore, JD
Facts
Marshall (plaintiff), a citizen of Wisconsin, filed a lawsuit in federal circuit court against the town of Elgin, Minnesota (defendant), seeking to recover unpaid interest on municipal bonds issued by Elgin. The bonds were worth a total of $7,500, and Marshall sought $1,660 in interest. Elgin opposed Marshall’s allegations, arguing instead that the municipal bonds were unconstitutional and void. The circuit court found in favor of Marshall and awarded Marshall $1,660. Elgin appealed to the United States Supreme Court. At the time, federal law established an amount-in-controversy requirement of $5,000 for the Supreme Court to have appellate jurisdiction over a civil case. Elgin believed that the amount in controversy exceeded the $5,000 requirement because of the total value of the bonds that Elgin sought to void.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Matthews, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.