Ellis Canning Co. v. International Harvester Co.
Kansas Supreme Court
255 P.2d 658 (Kan. 1953)
The defendant was servicing the plaintiff’s tractor when the defendant allegedly negligently started a fire in the tractor that caused damages. The plaintiff was insured by The Potomac Insurance Company (Potomac) and recovered the amount in damages from Potomac. The plaintiff then brought a negligence suit against the defendant seeking to recover the amount of damages from the defendant “for the use and benefit of the insurance company.” The defendant answered, charging that since the plaintiff was paid already by Potomac and was seeking recovery for Potomac, Potomac was the real party in interest and the plaintiff had no right to maintain the action. The plaintiff moved to strike that part of the answer and the motion was denied by the trial court. The plaintiff appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Parker, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 153,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,400 briefs, keyed to 183 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.