Ellis v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
643 P.2d 330 (Okla. Crim. App. 1982)
The defendant was charged with stealing a calf from Richard Owens. When the calf was found, the Sheriff let the calf loose in Owens’s pasture and after attempting to suckle numerous cows in the pasture and being denied, a cow came running towards the calf crying and immediately licked the calf and permitted it to nurse. The prosecution brought expert testimony of cattlemen that stated that this practice by the cow constituted “the accepted test for determining maternal lineage.” However, the defendant claimed that he had bought the calf in question and Leon Owens testified that he had sold a similar calf to the defendant. The Kiowa County District Court convicted the defendant and he appealed on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Bussey, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.